Keep prompts consistent
Use the same buyer wording across engines when the goal is a meaningful comparison.
Five engines. The ones that matter.
Wolf is deliberately focused on ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Mode, and Microsoft Copilot - with one coherent workflow and no distracting add-ons.
- ChatGPT1 credit per check
Observe how ChatGPT describes, compares, and recommends brands for your selected customer prompts.
- Perplexity2 credits per check
Inspect generated recommendations together with the web sources Perplexity exposes in its answers.
- Gemini1 credit per check
Measure brand inclusion, relative position, competitors, and available grounding sources in Gemini responses.
- Google AI Mode1 credit per check
Track conversational Google AI answers separately from traditional blue-link rankings and preserve available sources.
- Microsoft Copilot1 credit per check
See how Microsoft Copilot represents your category and which brands and sources appear for buyer questions.
One check is one prompt executed on one engine for one regional/language target. Availability may vary by region as engine providers change their own coverage.
Join waitlistWhy compare engines
There is no single AI result.
Each engine has its own models, retrieval systems, product experience, and source behavior. A brand may appear prominently in one answer and be absent from another, even when the user intent is similar. Wolf keeps each observation attached to its engine, prompt, regional target, timestamp, raw answer, and available citations.
Comparing engines helps distinguish a broad brand-information problem from an engine-specific gap. If competitors appear everywhere, the category evidence may be stronger for them. If the difference is isolated to one surface, the cited sources and answer wording can provide a narrower place to investigate.
Wolf reports sampled responses rather than claiming a fixed universal rank. Results can change as models, indexes, sources, location signals, and product interfaces change. Stable prompts and repeated, well-scoped runs are more useful than chasing a single favorable response.
Separate citations from mentions
A brand can be named without its website being cited; Wolf records those observations separately.
Review the raw answer
A percentage cannot show whether the description was accurate, favorable, or relevant to the buyer's need.